Zipmex vs BTC Markets
Per-trade cost favours Zipmex (0.2% taker, vs 0.85%). On listing breadth BTC Markets wins (40 assets vs 5). In our editorial rating BTC Markets leads (4.0 vs 1.5). For frequent trading, fees and liquidity matter most; for long-term holding, licences and reserve transparency do — weigh the points above against your usage.
| Zipmex | BTC Markets | |
|---|---|---|
| Tier | D | A |
| Rating | ★ 1.5 | ★ 4.0 |
| Maker / Taker fee | 0.2% / 0.2% | 0.5% / 0.85% |
| Markets | Spot | Spot |
| Max leverage | 1× | 1× |
| Supported assets | 5+ | 40+ |
| Trading pairs | 5+ | 32+ |
| 24h volume | $0 | — |
| Fiat on-ramp | Yes | Yes |
| Fund custody | Custodial (platform holds funds) | Custodial (platform holds funds) |
| KYC | Full | Full |
| Supported countries | APAC · 4+ countries | APAC · 1+ countries |
| Regulator | MAS, SEC Thailand, Bappebti, AUSTRAC | ASIC / AUSTRAC |
| OAM Italy registration | No | No |
| Segment | B2C | B2C |
| 24h volume (as of May 9) | — | $1.13M |
| Deposit methods | — | PayID/Osko (NPP), Bonifico bancario diretto (BSB e numero di conto), Carta |
| Geo restrictions | — | Solo residenti in Australia |
| Regions | APAC | APAC |
| Licences & safety | MPI / DCEP / VASP | AUSTRAC AU |
Frequently asked questions
Zipmex vs BTC Markets: which is better?
Per-trade cost favours Zipmex (0.2% taker, vs 0.85%). On listing breadth BTC Markets wins (40 assets vs 5). In our editorial rating BTC Markets leads (4.0 vs 1.5). For frequent trading, fees and liquidity matter most; for long-term holding, licences and reserve transparency do — weigh the points above against your usage.
Is Zipmex custodial or self-custody?
Zipmex is custodial: funds are held by the platform, while BTC Markets is custodial.