VALR vs BitOasis
Per-trade cost favours VALR (0.2% taker, vs 0.4%). On listing breadth VALR wins (140 assets vs 80). Only VALR offers derivatives (up to 20x leverage). For frequent trading, fees and liquidity matter most; for long-term holding, licences and reserve transparency do — weigh the points above against your usage.
| VALR | BitOasis | |
|---|---|---|
| Tier | B | B |
| Rating | ★ 3.8 | ★ 3.7 |
| Maker / Taker fee | 0.1% / 0.2% | 0.4% / 0.4% |
| Markets | Spot + Derivatives | Spot |
| Max leverage | 20× | 1× |
| Supported assets | 140+ | 80+ |
| Trading pairs | 77+ | 84+ |
| 24h volume | $21.9M | — |
| Fiat on-ramp | Yes | Yes |
| Deposit methods | Bonifico/EFT in ZAR, Carta di credito/debito (Visa/Mastercard), Apple Pay / Google Pay (Checkout.com), SWIFT, SEPA, Deposito crypto | Bonifico bancario / Wire transfer (AED), Easy Funding (link conto bancario UAE, AED, zero fee), Carta di credito/debito VISA e MasterCard, Apple Pay |
| Geo restrictions | US, CA, CU, IR, KP, KZ, RU, SO, SD, SS, SY, UA, IN | Non disponibile fuori dalla regione MENA (no UE, no USA, no Italia) |
| Staking / Earn | Staking SOL/AVAX/TRX up to 6% APY; lending up to 67% APR | — |
| Fund custody | Custodial (platform holds funds) | Custodial (platform holds funds) |
| KYC | Full | Full |
| Supported countries | AFRICA · 1+ countries | MENA · 5+ countries |
| Regulator | FSCA | VARA (Dubai) |
| OAM Italy registration | No | No |
| Segment | B2C | B2C |
| Regions | Africa | MENA |
| Licences & safety | FSCA South Africa | VARA Dubai + ADGM |
Frequently asked questions
VALR vs BitOasis: which is better?
Per-trade cost favours VALR (0.2% taker, vs 0.4%). On listing breadth VALR wins (140 assets vs 80). Only VALR offers derivatives (up to 20x leverage). For frequent trading, fees and liquidity matter most; for long-term holding, licences and reserve transparency do — weigh the points above against your usage.
Is VALR custodial or self-custody?
VALR is custodial: funds are held by the platform, while BitOasis is custodial.