Transact365 vs i2c
Transact365 and i2c compete in the same bracket: coverage, certifications and integration time-to-market decide it. On compliance i2c documents more certifications (1 vs 0). In our editorial rating i2c leads (4.4 vs 2.0). For a serious B2B comparison request custom pricing from both: public terms are only the starting point.
| Transact365 | i2c | |
|---|---|---|
| Tier | D | A |
| Rating | ★ 2.0 | ★ 4.4 |
| Service type | Card issuing / BaaS | Card issuing / BaaS |
| Pricing model | Hybrid | Hybrid |
| Fiat rails | SEPA, SWIFT | — |
| Fund custody | Self-custody (funds in your control) | Self-custody (funds in your control) |
| KYC | Full | — |
| Supported countries | APAC, AFRICA · 30+ countries | US, EEA, UK, APAC, MENA |
| Regulator | Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) | — |
| OAM Italy registration | No | — |
| Segment | B2B | B2B |
| Card networks | — | Visa, Mastercard, Amex, Discover |
| Card types | — | credit, debit, prepaid |
| Customer type | — | Enterprise, Fintech, SMEs |
| Certifications | — | PCI-DSS-L1 |
| Regions | APAC, Africa | US, EU/EEA, UK, APAC, MENA |
| Licences & safety | Authorised Payment Institution / EMI |
Frequently asked questions
Transact365 vs i2c: which is better?
Transact365 and i2c compete in the same bracket: coverage, certifications and integration time-to-market decide it. On compliance i2c documents more certifications (1 vs 0). In our editorial rating i2c leads (4.4 vs 2.0). For a serious B2B comparison request custom pricing from both: public terms are only the starting point.
Is Transact365 custodial or self-custody?
Transact365 is self-custody: you keep the keys, while i2c is self-custody.