Toku vs Kotani Pay

Toku and Kotani Pay compete in the same bracket: coverage, certifications and integration time-to-market decide it. For a serious B2B comparison request custom pricing from both: public terms are only the starting point.

Toku Kotani Pay
Tier A B
Rating ★ 4.2 ★ 3.9
Service type Payroll / EOR Payroll / EOR
Pricing model Not disclosed Spread (bps)
Fiat rails ACH, Wire, SEPA, SWIFT
Stablecoins USDC, USDT, PYUSD, USDG, RLUSD USDC, USDT, cUSD
Fund custody Self-custody (funds in your control) Self-custody (funds in your control)
KYC Full Full
Supported countries US, EEA, APAC, LATAM · 100+ countries AFRICA · 60+ countries
Regulator Not disclosed FSCA
OAM Italy registration No No
Segment B2B B2B
Spread 100 bps
SDK JavaScript, TypeScript, REST
Processed volume $23M
Regions US, EU/EEA, APAC, LATAM Africa
Licences & safety N/A CASP
Toku 4.2/5 · Tier A
Kotani Pay 3.9/5 · Tier B

Frequently asked questions

Toku vs Kotani Pay: which is better?

Toku and Kotani Pay compete in the same bracket: coverage, certifications and integration time-to-market decide it. For a serious B2B comparison request custom pricing from both: public terms are only the starting point.

Which is cheaper, Toku or Kotani Pay?

On the standard spending profile Toku has the lowest net annual cost: €228 versus — for Kotani Pay.

Is Toku custodial or self-custody?

Toku is self-custody: you keep the keys, while Kotani Pay is self-custody.