Starling Business vs ANNA Money
For spending abroad FX markup matters, and Starling Business does better (0.4% vs 0.5%). In short: Starling Business if your usage matches its strength, ANNA Money otherwise — the numbers above beat any slogan.
| Starling Business | ANNA Money | |
|---|---|---|
| Tier | A | A |
| Rating | ★ 4.5 | ★ 4.4 |
| Estimated net annual cost | €0 | €0 |
| Account fee | Free | Free |
| IBAN | dedicato · GB | dedicato · GB |
| Deposit guarantee | FSCS £85,000 (UK) | — |
| Multi-currency | Yes · 3 currencies | Yes · 4 currencies |
| Outbound transfers to third-party IBANs | Yes | Yes |
| Utility direct billing | Yes | No |
| SEPA direct debit (SDD) | Yes | No |
| On-chain crypto withdrawal | No | No |
| SEPA transfer | Free | €5 |
| Interest on balance | 0% | 3.66% |
| ATM withdrawal | not declared | not declared |
| Fund custody | Custodial (platform holds funds) | Custodial (platform holds funds) |
| KYC | Full | Full |
| Supported countries | UK · 1+ countries | UK · 1+ countries |
| Regulator | PRA, FCA | FCA |
| OAM Italy registration | No | No |
| Segment | B2B | B2B |
| Regions | UK | UK |
| Licences & safety | Full Banking License | EMI |
Frequently asked questions
Starling Business vs ANNA Money: which is better?
For spending abroad FX markup matters, and Starling Business does better (0.4% vs 0.5%). In short: Starling Business if your usage matches its strength, ANNA Money otherwise — the numbers above beat any slogan.
Which is cheaper, Starling Business or ANNA Money?
On the standard spending profile Starling Business has the lowest net annual cost: €0 versus €0 for ANNA Money.
Is Starling Business custodial or self-custody?
Starling Business is custodial: funds are held by the platform, while ANNA Money is custodial.
Which is better for spending abroad?
For foreign-currency spending Starling Business wins, with the lowest FX markup: 0.4%.