Penta vs Paynetics

In our editorial rating Paynetics leads (4.4 vs 3.8). Neither wins across the board: weigh the points above against your use case before choosing between Penta and Paynetics.

Penta Paynetics
Tier B A
Rating ★ 3.8 ★ 4.4
Estimated net annual cost €0 €0
Account fee Free Free
IBAN dedicato · DE condiviso · BG, UK
Multi-currency No (single currency) Yes · 5 currencies
Outbound transfers to third-party IBANs Yes No
Utility direct billing Yes No
SEPA direct debit (SDD) Yes No
On-chain crypto withdrawal No No
SEPA transfer Free Free
Interest on balance 0% 0%
ATM withdrawal not declared not declared
Fund custody Custodial (platform holds funds) Custodial (platform holds funds)
KYC Full Full
Supported countries EEA · 1+ countries EEA, UK · 31+ countries
Regulator BaFin BNB (Bulgaria) + FCA (UK)
OAM Italy registration No No
Segment B2B B2B
Regions EU/EEA EU/EEA, UK
Licences & safety Banking-as-a-Service (solarisBank) EMI
Penta 3.8/5 · Tier B
Paynetics 4.4/5 · Tier A

Frequently asked questions

Penta vs Paynetics: which is better?

In our editorial rating Paynetics leads (4.4 vs 3.8). Neither wins across the board: weigh the points above against your use case before choosing between Penta and Paynetics.

Which is cheaper, Penta or Paynetics?

On the standard spending profile Penta has the lowest net annual cost: €0 versus €0 for Paynetics.

Is Penta custodial or self-custody?

Penta is custodial: funds are held by the platform, while Paynetics is custodial.