iBanFirst vs Centtrip

The choice depends on your real spending profile: redo the math with your volumes before picking between iBanFirst and Centtrip.

iBanFirst Centtrip
Tier A A
Rating ★ 4.5 ★ 4.4
Estimated net annual cost €0 €0
Account fee Free Free
IBAN dedicato · BE, FR, DE, NL, GB, US dedicato · GB, EEA
Multi-currency Yes · 30 currencies Yes · 15 currencies
Outbound transfers to third-party IBANs Yes No
Utility direct billing Yes No
SEPA direct debit (SDD) Yes No
On-chain crypto withdrawal No No
SEPA transfer Free
Interest on balance 0% 0%
ATM withdrawal not declared not declared
Fund custody Custodial (platform holds funds) Custodial (platform holds funds)
KYC Full Full
Supported countries EEA, UK · 50+ countries EEA, UK, US, APAC · 100+ countries
Regulator NBB FCA
OAM Italy registration No No
Segment B2B B2B
Regions EU/EEA, UK EU/EEA, UK, US, APAC
Licences & safety Payment Institution EMI
iBanFirst 4.5/5 · Tier A
Centtrip 4.4/5 · Tier A

Frequently asked questions

iBanFirst vs Centtrip: which is better?

The choice depends on your real spending profile: redo the math with your volumes before picking between iBanFirst and Centtrip.

Which is cheaper, iBanFirst or Centtrip?

On the standard spending profile iBanFirst has the lowest net annual cost: €0 versus €0 for Centtrip.

Is iBanFirst custodial or self-custody?

iBanFirst is custodial: funds are held by the platform, while Centtrip is custodial.

Which is better for spending abroad?

For foreign-currency spending iBanFirst wins, with the lowest FX markup: 0%.