Upbit vs CoinSwitch Kuber
Per-trade cost favours CoinSwitch Kuber (0% taker, vs 0.25%). On listing breadth Upbit wins (250 assets vs 150). In our editorial rating Upbit leads (4.3 vs 3.8). For frequent trading, fees and liquidity matter most; for long-term holding, licences and reserve transparency do — weigh the points above against your usage.
| Upbit | CoinSwitch Kuber | |
|---|---|---|
| Tier | A | B |
| Rating | ★ 4.3 | ★ 3.8 |
| Maker / Taker fee | 0.25% / 0.25% | 0% / 0% |
| Markets | Spot | Spot |
| Max leverage | 1× | 25× |
| Supported assets | 250+ | 150+ |
| Trading pairs | 200+ | 100+ |
| 24h volume | $2B | — |
| Fiat on-ramp | Yes | Yes |
| Deposit methods | KRW bank transfer (K-Bank real-name account), KakaoPay, Crypto deposit | UPI, IMPS, NEFT, RTGS |
| Geo restrictions | USA, Italy, EU (non-Korean residents), OFAC-sanctioned countries, FATF black/grey list countries | USA, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Syria, Sudan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Crimea |
| Staking / Earn | Staking available | — |
| Fund custody | Custodial (platform holds funds) | Custodial (platform holds funds) |
| KYC | Full | Full |
| Supported countries | APAC · 1+ countries | APAC · 1+ countries |
| Regulator | FSS | FIU-India |
| OAM Italy registration | No | No |
| Segment | B2C | B2C |
| Regions | APAC | APAC |
| Licences & safety | VASP Korea | FIU India |
Frequently asked questions
Upbit vs CoinSwitch Kuber: which is better?
Per-trade cost favours CoinSwitch Kuber (0% taker, vs 0.25%). On listing breadth Upbit wins (250 assets vs 150). In our editorial rating Upbit leads (4.3 vs 3.8). For frequent trading, fees and liquidity matter most; for long-term holding, licences and reserve transparency do — weigh the points above against your usage.
Is Upbit custodial or self-custody?
Upbit is custodial: funds are held by the platform, while CoinSwitch Kuber is custodial.