ProBit Global vs CoinSwitch Kuber
Per-trade cost favours CoinSwitch Kuber (0% taker, vs 0.2%). On listing breadth ProBit Global wins (600 assets vs 150). In our editorial rating CoinSwitch Kuber leads (3.8 vs 2.5). For frequent trading, fees and liquidity matter most; for long-term holding, licences and reserve transparency do — weigh the points above against your usage.
| ProBit Global | CoinSwitch Kuber | |
|---|---|---|
| Tier | D | B |
| Rating | ★ 2.5 | ★ 3.8 |
| Maker / Taker fee | 0.2% / 0.2% | 0% / 0% |
| Markets | Spot | Spot |
| Max leverage | 1× | 25× |
| Supported assets | 600+ | 150+ |
| Trading pairs | 1000+ | 100+ |
| 24h volume | $0 | — |
| Fiat on-ramp | Yes | Yes |
| Deposit methods | crypto, carta di credito/debito, bonifico bancario, Apple Pay, Google Pay | UPI, IMPS, NEFT, RTGS |
| Fund custody | Custodial (platform holds funds) | Custodial (platform holds funds) |
| KYC | Full | Full |
| Supported countries | APAC · 30+ countries | APAC · 1+ countries |
| Regulator | Unregulated | FIU-India |
| OAM Italy registration | No | No |
| Segment | B2C | B2C |
| Geo restrictions | — | USA, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Syria, Sudan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Crimea |
| Regions | APAC | APAC |
| Licences & safety | VASP Korea | FIU India |
Frequently asked questions
ProBit Global vs CoinSwitch Kuber: which is better?
Per-trade cost favours CoinSwitch Kuber (0% taker, vs 0.2%). On listing breadth ProBit Global wins (600 assets vs 150). In our editorial rating CoinSwitch Kuber leads (3.8 vs 2.5). For frequent trading, fees and liquidity matter most; for long-term holding, licences and reserve transparency do — weigh the points above against your usage.
Is ProBit Global custodial or self-custody?
ProBit Global is custodial: funds are held by the platform, while CoinSwitch Kuber is custodial.