Penta vs ANNA Money

For spending abroad FX markup matters, and Penta does better (0% vs 0.5%). In our editorial rating ANNA Money leads (4.4 vs 3.8). In short: Penta if your usage matches its strength, ANNA Money otherwise — the numbers above beat any slogan.

Penta ANNA Money
Tier B A
Rating ★ 3.8 ★ 4.4
Estimated net annual cost €0 €0
Account fee Free Free
IBAN dedicato · DE dedicato · GB
Multi-currency No (single currency) Yes · 4 currencies
Outbound transfers to third-party IBANs Yes Yes
Utility direct billing Yes No
SEPA direct debit (SDD) Yes No
On-chain crypto withdrawal No No
SEPA transfer Free €5
Interest on balance 0% 3.66%
ATM withdrawal not declared not declared
Fund custody Custodial (platform holds funds) Custodial (platform holds funds)
KYC Full Full
Supported countries EEA · 1+ countries UK · 1+ countries
Regulator BaFin FCA
OAM Italy registration No No
Segment B2B B2B
Regions EU/EEA UK
Licences & safety Banking-as-a-Service (solarisBank) EMI
Penta 3.8/5 · Tier B
ANNA Money 4.4/5 · Tier A

Frequently asked questions

Penta vs ANNA Money: which is better?

For spending abroad FX markup matters, and Penta does better (0% vs 0.5%). In our editorial rating ANNA Money leads (4.4 vs 3.8). In short: Penta if your usage matches its strength, ANNA Money otherwise — the numbers above beat any slogan.

Which is cheaper, Penta or ANNA Money?

On the standard spending profile Penta has the lowest net annual cost: €0 versus €0 for ANNA Money.

Is Penta custodial or self-custody?

Penta is custodial: funds are held by the platform, while ANNA Money is custodial.

Which is better for spending abroad?

For foreign-currency spending Penta wins, with the lowest FX markup: 0%.