HashKey Exchange vs RabbitX
Per-trade cost favours RabbitX (0.05% taker, vs 0.1%). On listing breadth HashKey Exchange wins (80 assets vs 4). In our editorial rating HashKey Exchange leads (4.5 vs 1.5). For frequent trading, fees and liquidity matter most; for long-term holding, licences and reserve transparency do — weigh the points above against your usage.
| HashKey Exchange | RabbitX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tier | A | D |
| Rating | ★ 4.5 | ★ 1.5 |
| Maker / Taker fee | 0.05% / 0.1% | -0.01% / 0.05% |
| Markets | Spot + Derivatives | Derivatives |
| Supported assets | 80+ | 4+ |
| Trading pairs | 30+ | — |
| Fiat on-ramp | Yes | No |
| Deposit methods | Bonifico bancario (Standard Chartered Bank, ZA Bank), FPS (Faster Payment System) per HKD, Bonifico USD | USDC (crypto wallet), ETH (crypto wallet) |
| Fund custody | Custodial (platform holds funds) | Self-custody (funds in your control) |
| KYC | Full | Full |
| Supported countries | APAC · 5+ countries | US, EEA, APAC, LATAM, MENA, AFRICA · 100+ countries |
| Regulator | SFC | none |
| OAM Italy registration | No | No |
| Segment | B2C | B2C |
| Max leverage | — | 50× |
| Geo restrictions | — | Restricted/sanctioned jurisdictions (UN/EU/US) |
| Regions | APAC | US, EU/EEA, APAC, LATAM, MENA, Africa |
| Licences & safety | SFC Hong Kong + VARA Dubai | none |
Frequently asked questions
HashKey Exchange vs RabbitX: which is better?
Per-trade cost favours RabbitX (0.05% taker, vs 0.1%). On listing breadth HashKey Exchange wins (80 assets vs 4). In our editorial rating HashKey Exchange leads (4.5 vs 1.5). For frequent trading, fees and liquidity matter most; for long-term holding, licences and reserve transparency do — weigh the points above against your usage.
Is HashKey Exchange custodial or self-custody?
HashKey Exchange is custodial: funds are held by the platform, while RabbitX is self-custody.