Fireblocks vs Kinexys
Fireblocks and Kinexys compete in the same bracket: coverage, certifications and integration time-to-market decide it. On compliance Fireblocks documents more certifications (5 vs 0). For a serious B2B comparison request custom pricing from both: public terms are only the starting point.
| Fireblocks | Kinexys | |
|---|---|---|
| Tier | S | A |
| Rating | ★ 4.7 | ★ 4.5 |
| Service type | Stablecoin infrastructure | Stablecoin infrastructure |
| Pricing model | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Custody model | MPC | — |
| Customer type | Enterprise, Fintech, Developers, Platforms | Enterprise, Platforms |
| Certifications | SOC2-T2, ISO27001, ISO27017, ISO27018, ISO22301 | — |
| Fund custody | Self-custody (funds in your control) | Custodial (platform holds funds) |
| Supported countries | US, EEA, UK, APAC, MENA, LATAM | US, EEA, UK, APAC |
| OAM Italy registration | No | — |
| Segment | B2B | B2B |
| Regulator | — | OCC (US) |
| Regions | US, EU/EEA, UK, APAC, MENA, LATAM | US, EU/EEA, UK, APAC |
| Licences & safety | OCC National Bank Charter |
Frequently asked questions
Fireblocks vs Kinexys: which is better?
Fireblocks and Kinexys compete in the same bracket: coverage, certifications and integration time-to-market decide it. On compliance Fireblocks documents more certifications (5 vs 0). For a serious B2B comparison request custom pricing from both: public terms are only the starting point.
Is Fireblocks custodial or self-custody?
Fireblocks is self-custody: you keep the keys, while Kinexys is custodial.