BitOasis vs NovaDAX
Per-trade cost favours BitOasis (0.4% taker, vs 0.5%). For frequent trading, fees and liquidity matter most; for long-term holding, licences and reserve transparency do — weigh the points above against your usage.
| BitOasis | NovaDAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tier | B | B |
| Rating | ★ 3.7 | ★ 3.7 |
| Maker / Taker fee | 0.4% / 0.4% | 0.3% / 0.5% |
| Markets | Spot | Spot |
| Max leverage | 1× | 1× |
| Supported assets | 80+ | 80+ |
| Trading pairs | 84+ | 600+ |
| Fiat on-ramp | Yes | Yes |
| Deposit methods | Bonifico bancario / Wire transfer (AED), Easy Funding (link conto bancario UAE, AED, zero fee), Carta di credito/debito VISA e MasterCard, Apple Pay | Pix (BRL), Bonifico bancario / TED (BRL) |
| Geo restrictions | Non disponibile fuori dalla regione MENA (no UE, no USA, no Italia) | US, IR, KP, CU |
| Fund custody | Custodial (platform holds funds) | Custodial (platform holds funds) |
| KYC | Full | Full |
| Supported countries | MENA · 5+ countries | LATAM · 1+ countries |
| Regulator | VARA (Dubai) | VQF (AML), non specificato |
| OAM Italy registration | No | No |
| Segment | B2C | B2C |
| 24h volume | — | $3.76M |
| Staking / Earn | — | Staking program con lock 1-4 anni |
| Regions | MENA | LATAM |
| Licences & safety | VARA Dubai + ADGM | BCB |
Frequently asked questions
BitOasis vs NovaDAX: which is better?
Per-trade cost favours BitOasis (0.4% taker, vs 0.5%). For frequent trading, fees and liquidity matter most; for long-term holding, licences and reserve transparency do — weigh the points above against your usage.
Is BitOasis custodial or self-custody?
BitOasis is custodial: funds are held by the platform, while NovaDAX is custodial.