B4B Payments vs Marqeta

Different commercial models: B4B Payments prices per-transaction, Marqeta interchange-share — real cost depends on your volumes. On compliance Marqeta documents more certifications (2 vs 1). In our editorial rating Marqeta leads (4.8 vs 4.3). For a serious B2B comparison request custom pricing from both: public terms are only the starting point.

B4B Payments Marqeta
Tier A S
Rating ★ 4.3 ★ 4.8
Service type Card issuing / BaaS Card issuing / BaaS
Pricing model Per transaction Interchange share
Spread 0 bps 50–200 bps
Per-card fee $0.00 virtual · $0.00 physical
Card networks Mastercard, Visa Visa, Mastercard
Card types virtual, physical, prepaid virtual, physical, debit, credit, prepaid
Settlement time T+1
Fiat rails SWIFT ACH, Wire
Certifications PCI-DSS-L1 SOC2-T2, PCI-DSS-L1
Processed volume $0 $84B
Fund custody Self-custody (funds in your control) Self-custody (funds in your control)
KYC Full Full
Supported countries EEA, UK, US · 50+ countries US, EEA, UK, APAC · 150+ countries
Regulator FCA FCA (UK); CFPB / state regulators (US); EU local regulators
OAM Italy registration No No
Segment B2B B2B
Stablecoins USDC
Customer type Fintech, Enterprise, Platforms
SDK Node, Python, Java, .NET
Currencies USD, EUR, GBP
Regions EU/EEA, UK, US US, EU/EEA, UK, APAC
Licences & safety EMI FCA
B4B Payments 4.3/5 · Tier A
Marqeta 4.8/5 · Tier S

Frequently asked questions

B4B Payments vs Marqeta: which is better?

Different commercial models: B4B Payments prices per-transaction, Marqeta interchange-share — real cost depends on your volumes. On compliance Marqeta documents more certifications (2 vs 1). In our editorial rating Marqeta leads (4.8 vs 4.3). For a serious B2B comparison request custom pricing from both: public terms are only the starting point.

Is B4B Payments custodial or self-custody?

B4B Payments is self-custody: you keep the keys, while Marqeta is self-custody.