Costs, licensing, consumer protection Privacy, self-custody, censorship resistance

Balancer

Balancer

3.8/5 3.2/5
Liquidity model AMM

Data verified on unchanged since the sources

Worth it if you provide liquidity or swap on-chain and want custom-weighted pools (not just 50/50) across multiple chains, with veBAL tokenomics.

Avoid it if you want maximum liquidity and name recognition: TVL is declining versus Uniswap and Curve, and the protocol suffered a hack in 2023.

A multi-chain DEX known for its weighted pools, which go beyond the 50/50 scheme, and for its veBAL tokenomics. Caveats include a declining TVL, the 2023 hack and lower visibility compared to Uniswap and Curve, as well as the complexity of weighted pools.

73
Transparency: Medium
73/100 · see methodology
73
Data exposure: Medium
73/100 · lower is better for sovereignty · methodology

Data & conditions

Liquidity model AMM
Maker / Taker fee 0.01% / 10%
Markets Spot
Supported chains Ethereum, Arbitrum, Polygon, Optimism, Avalanche, Base, Gnosis
TVL (as of Jun 13) $850M
24h volume $14.87M
Native token BAL
Fund custody Non-custodial (funds in your wallet)
Supported wallets MetaMask, Coinbase Wallet, WalletConnect
Audits OpenZeppelin (Vault, Weighted Pool, Stable Pool — mar 2021; MultiRewards, Stable Pool — ott 2021), Trail of Bits (Vault e pool — apr 2021; Linear/Stable Phantom Pool — ott 2021; Batch Relayer — mag 2022; Composable Stable Pool — set 2022; Managed Pool — ott 2022), Certora (formal verification Vault — apr 2021; Composable Stable Pool — set 2022), ABDK (Timelock Authorizer — mag 2022)
Governance BAL token + Balancer DAO. Post-Q2 2026 restructuring: veBAL vote-locking discontinued, 1-BAL-1-Vote Snapshot governance, fees routed 100% to DAO treasury, $3.6M buyback program authorized.
KYC Full
Supported countries US, EEA, APAC, LATAM, MENA, AFRICA · 200+ countries
Regulator None
Segment B2C
MiCA / License status None (decentralized protocol)

Strengths

  • Weighted pools (not only 50/50); veBAL tokenomics; multi-chain.
  • Self-custody: funds stay in your wallet — the platform cannot touch them.
  • Permissionless and decentralized: no approval needed to operate.
  • Public security audits.

Weaknesses

  • TVL in calo; hack 2023; less known vs Uniswap/Curve.
  • Full KYC required: verified identity, zero pseudonymity.

Verdict

B B ★ 3.8/5 ★ 3.2/5

For the mainstream user the score stays held back: no formal protection, no regulator and the complexity of weighted pools moving beyond the simple 50/50, exposing users to impermanent loss that is hard to gauge. The 2023 hack and a declining TVL do not help trust, and with key responsibility entirely on the user the protection margin is minimal.

From a crypto-native angle Balancer earns its place through flexibility: a non-custodial AMM across seven chains (Ethereum, Arbitrum, Polygon, Optimism, Avalanche, Base, Gnosis), with weighted pools that go beyond the 50/50 scheme and on-chain veBAL governance. A 0.01% maker fee and fully on-chain settlement confirm a trustless, censorship-resistant protocol; the declining TVL is the real limit lowering its standing against Uniswap and Curve.

Privacy & anonymity 30% 2.3
Fund control 20% 5.0
Censorship resistance 20% 3.3
Trustless / auditability 20% 4.2
Costs 10% 0.0

Promp's editorial rating based on real fees and net annual cost. Promp reviews third-party products independently.

"Sovereignty" rating: score computed on privacy/anonymity (30%), fund control (20%), censorship resistance (20%), trustless/auditability (20%) and costs (10%). Same data, different weights.

Reputation

What happened to people who used Balancer, and what users say. External signals: they do not feed the promp.it rating.

Incidents & regulatory actions

Notable incidents

Documented events with consequences still open. Each entry carries a source and a date.

  1. Hack / funds theft Critical $95M ● open

    Balancer V2 Composable Stable Pool exploit: $94.8M of user funds stolen

    On 3 November 2025 at 07:46 UTC an attacker exploited a rounding error in the `upscale` function of Balancer V2 Composable Stable Pools v5, on Ethereum and several layer-2 networks. The official post-mortem puts the theft at $94.8M of user funds (outlets reported gross figures between $116M and $128M, which include funds later protected or recovered). Balancer states that V3 and the other V2 pool types were unaffected. Partial recoveries: ~$19.7M in osETH/osGNO returned via StakeWise, a Gnosis Chain hard fork, and ~$8M returned to affected LPs under proposal BIP-892. Balancer Labs wound up as a company in March 2026 and the DAO continued in reduced form. On 14 September 2026 Marcus Hardt, former CEO of Balancer Labs, filed a proposal on the official forum for an orderly wind-down of the protocol with distribution of the treasury (~$9.96M) to BAL holders: Snapshot vote from 25 to 29 September 2026 and, if approved, on 30 October 2026 the pools that can be paused move to withdrawals only.

    ↗ source
  2. Hack / funds theft Moderate $234K ● open

    New Balancer V1 pool exploit: ~$234,000 through a rounding bug of the same family

    On 31 August 2026 security firm SlowMist flagged the exploitation of a Balancer V1-style pool: the attacker squeezed the pool's WBTC reserves down to a minimum and then minted pool tokens (BPT) by depositing a single satoshi, because the contract rounds down. Estimated loss ~$234,000. On 3 September Balancer sent an on-chain message to the addresses involved offering a path to return the funds, announcing it on its X account on 4 September; as of the verification date no return has been announced. It concerns V1 pools, the oldest architecture, not V3.

    ↗ source

verified on

FAQ

Is Balancer truly decentralized?

Balancer is a non-custodial decentralized exchange: funds stay in your wallet. Liquidity model: AMM. Governance token: BAL.

Which blockchains does Balancer support?

Balancer is available on Ethereum, Arbitrum, Polygon, Optimism, Avalanche, Base and Gnosis.

What is Balancer's TVL?

Balancer's Total Value Locked is about $850M (snapshot 2026-06-13). The figure is dynamic: check the live value on DefiLlama.

What are Balancer's fees?

Balancer's trading fees range 0.01% – 10%. On top of these there are on-chain gas fees, which vary with network congestion.

Does Balancer support perpetuals and leverage?

Balancer does not offer perpetuals. It supports spot token swaps.

Sources

Show 8 more sources

Update history

✓ Terms unchanged since Jun 1, 2026

🔔 Notify me of changes

← Back to DEX – Decentralized Exchanges