Paxos vs Kinexys
Paxos and Kinexys compete in the same bracket: coverage, certifications and integration time-to-market decide it. For a serious B2B comparison request custom pricing from both: public terms are only the starting point.
| Paxos | Kinexys | |
|---|---|---|
| Tier | S | A |
| Rating | ★ 4.7 | ★ 4.5 |
| Service type | Stablecoin infrastructure | Stablecoin infrastructure |
| Pricing model | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Stablecoins | USDP, PYUSD, USDG, PAXG | — |
| Custody model | qualified-custody | — |
| Customer type | Enterprise, Fintech, Platforms | Enterprise, Platforms |
| Fund custody | Custodial (platform holds funds) | Custodial (platform holds funds) |
| Supported countries | US, EEA, MENA, APAC | US, EEA, UK, APAC |
| Regulator | OCC (US) / NYDFS (US) | OCC (US) |
| Segment | B2B | B2B |
| Regions | US, EU/EEA, MENA, APAC | US, EU/EEA, UK, APAC |
| Licences & safety | OCC National Trust Charter (US), NYDFS supervision, FSRA (ADGM, Abu Dhabi) | OCC National Bank Charter |
Frequently asked questions
Paxos vs Kinexys: which is better?
Paxos and Kinexys compete in the same bracket: coverage, certifications and integration time-to-market decide it. For a serious B2B comparison request custom pricing from both: public terms are only the starting point.
Is Paxos custodial or self-custody?
Paxos is custodial: funds are held by the platform, while Kinexys is custodial.